Tag Archives: Engineering

Something for nothing?

Leave a reply

Let’s try a thought experiment, following on from my previous post (Beyond Zero on 20th February, 2013).  Imagine two equal amounts of matter, A and B at -350 Kelvin and 350 Kelvin respectively.  We would expect heat to flow from the hot one, that’s B to A, the cold one.  This would cause the internal energy of B to decrease with a corresponding rise in the internal energy of A so that B gets colder while A gets hotter, i.e. they both move closer to absolute zero with corresponding decreases in entropy.  The Second Law of Thermodynamics does not allow this to happen and in fact the reverse would occur, i.e. heat would flow from the cold one A to B, lowering the temperature of A and raising the temperature of B so that they both move away from absolute zero with corresponding increases in entropy.coldgraph2

IF we could actually make this happen then we would able to design engines with efficiencies higher that 100%.  One corollary of the Second Law of Thermodynamics is that heat cannot be converted into work without some of the heat being wasted or lost as entropy.  In a power station, heat is taken from a hot source (e.g. a nuclear reactor, solar concentrator or gas furnace) and some of it converted into shaft work, which turns a generator to produce electricity, while the remainder is dumped into a cold sink usually the environment via cooling towers.  However, if our cold sink was at a negative temperature on the Kelvin scale then we could take heat from the cold sink and the hot source at the same time!  Why aren’t we doing this?  Well, we don’t have any naturally occurring cold sinks at below zero Kelvin and to create one uses more energy than we would gain in our super-efficient power station – that’s the Second Law kicking in again.  So you can’t have something for nothing.

Beyond zero

1 Reply

Recently a study has been published in Science [http://www.sciencemag.org/content/339/6115/52] about creating temperatures below absolute zero (see previous post on Arbitrary Zero, 13 February 2013), i.e. negative temperatures on the Kelvin and Rankine scales.  Temperature is a measure or indicator of the internal energy of matter which in turn is related to the spin state of electrons.  Electrons have two available spin states that are known as ‘up’ and ‘down’.  At room temperature more electrons have ‘down’ spin than ‘up’, and as absolute zero is approached all electrons align to have ‘down’ spin which is a configuration that corresponds to zero entropy.  When the temperature rises from room temperature, electrons tend to switch from ‘down’ to ‘up’ spin so that at an infinite temperature there are equal numbers of electrons in the two spin states.

The current theory is that at -300 Kelvin more electrons have ‘up’ than ‘down’ spin, i.e. a mirror image of the situation at +300 Kelvin.  If the temperature is lowered still further then the ‘up’ spin electrons tend to switch to ‘down’ spin so that at a negative infinite temperature there are equal numbers of electrons with ‘up’ and ‘down’ spin.  This state is equivalent to an infinite positive temperature, i.e. the absolute temperature scale can be considered to be circular or to have the negative and positive components joined at zero and infinity.

If you have made it this far then well done!  But if you didn’t quite follow everything then try the explanation at Newsy [http://www.newsy.com/videos/scientists-create-negative-kelvin-temperature-gas/ ].

Arbitrary zero

2 Replies

thermometerAs mentioned in my previous post (Lincoln On Equality, 6th February, 2013), the Zeroth Law of Thermodynamics enables the concept of temperature and temperature scales to be established.  The Swedish astronomer, Anders Celsius (1701-44) devised a temperature scale on which water froze at 100 degrees and boiled at zero, i.e. the opposite way around to the scale that bears his name today.  Daniel Fahrenheit (1686-1736), a German instrument maker, was probably the first to use a mercury thermometer and he assigned zero to the lowest temperature he could achieve, which was for a mixture of salt and water.  He chose his body temperature as 100 degrees because it was an easily portable standard, but not ideal because it is not totally reproducible.  Fahrenheit’s scale had a temporary advantage because negative numbers were rarely needed given the technology of the day and that water freezes at 32 degrees Fahrenheit.

Somewhat later it was decided that it might be more appropriate to set zero as the lowest attainable temperature, known as absolute zero, which is defined by the Third Law of Thermodynamics as the temperature at which the entropy of all perfectly crystalline pure substances is zero.  This lead to definition of two temperature scales: the Kelvin scale with degrees the same size as on the Celsius scale so that water freezes and boils at 273K and 373K respectively; and the Rankine scale with degrees the same size as the Fahrenheit scale.

Actually, absolute zero is not attainable.  The world record stands at 810 trillionths of a degree Rankine (see http://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/phenom-200801.html).

Image credit: arztsamui / FreeDigitalPhotos.net

Unavoidable junk

3 Replies

167-6734_IMGThe laws of thermodynamics are physical laws whose relevance extend beyond the study of engines and heat plants.  We can restate the first law of thermodynamics (conservation of energy) as ‘the quantity of matter is constant and finite’.  Matter changes both in nature and as it moves through the economic system; and as it does so, its intrinsic properties change rendering it less useful and usable, thus requiring more and more resources to make it useful again.  This last sentence is a form of the second law of thermodynamics.  Very useful (low entropy) goods, such as iron ore and fossil fuels, eventually produce less useful (high entropy) matter, such as piles of junk cars in scrap-metal yards and greenhouse gases, as they move through the economic system.  In our current western life-style, we are all contributing to the generation of vast piles of junk; we are hooked on it; we are all ‘junkies’.

In the paragraph above, I have plagiarised the 2009 report entitled ‘The New Sustainable Frontier’ mentioned in the previous posting on this blog [http://www.gsa.gov/graphics/ogp/2009_New_Sustainable_Frontier_Complete_Guide.pdf ].  However, similar ideas were expressed by Handscombe and Patterson in their 2004 book entitled the ‘Entropy Vector’ [http://www.worldscientific.com/worldscibooks/10.1142/5365 ].  They paraphrased the first and second laws of thermodynamics as ‘you can’t have something nothing’ and ‘you can’t have it just anyway you like it’.